Tampa Family Lawyer > Results
Results
2020
| STATE v. C.S. | |
|---|---|
| CASE NUMBER(S) | State Attorney’s Office Case No. WCM2000041 |
| RELIEF SOUGHT BY OPPOSING PARTY | The State sought to hold C.S. responsible for an alleged worthless check and gave C.S. a deadline to repay the landlord to whom the check was written. |
| COUNTY | Pasco |
| DISPOSITION | Taking quick action attorney Faulkner gather sworn statements from key witnesses showing that the check in question was a post-dated check improperly deposited by an unscrupulous landlord. In response to a submittal to the State from attorney Faulkner asking that the case be dropped, the State dropped all charges. |
| YEAR OF DISPOSITION | 2020 |
| STATE v. T.B. | |
|---|---|
| CASE NUMBER(S) | 2020-CF-002498-A |
| RELIEF SOUGHT BY OPPOSING PARTY | The State sought to prosecute T.B. for the alleged offense of Felony Domestic Violence. |
| COUNTY | Polk |
| DISPOSITION | Attorney Faulkner acted quickly by obtaining from the alleged victim a sworn statement declining prosecution and had T.B. complete a four-hour anger management class. Attorney Faulkner then provided the State with the sworn statement and proof of the class completion, thereby convincing the State to drop all charges. |
| YEAR OF DISPOSITION | 2020 |
| STATE v. C.G. | |
|---|---|
| CASE NUMBER(S) | 2019-CT-002703-A-O |
| RELIEF SOUGHT BY OPPOSING PARTY | C.W. sought to be released early from being on probation. |
| COUNTY | Orange |
| DISPOSITION | Attorney Faulkner was able to get C.G. released early from probation despite the State’s position that C.G. did not meet their criteria for early termination of probation. Attorney Faulkner was able to accomplish that result without need of a hearing. |
| YEAR OF DISPOSITION | 2020 |
| A.G. v. D.G. | |
|---|---|
| CASE NUMBER(S) | 19-DR-5591-ES |
| RELIEF SOUGHT BY OPPOSING PARTY | Attorney Faulkner represented A.G. in a divorce case against D.G. The parties had been married for 10 years and D.G. was unemployed whereas A.G. made substantial income. D.G. sought to hurt D.G. by making criminal allegations against him to both law enforcement and to A.G.’s federal law enforcement employer. D.G. also sought alimony from A.G. and a share of A.G.’s federal pension. |
| COUNTY | Pasco |
| DISPOSITION |
Attorney Faulkner was able to get the case settled with these results in favor of A.G.:
|
| YEAR OF DISPOSITION | 2020 |
| STATE v. R.A.S. | |
|---|---|
| CASE NUMBER(S) | 17-CF-14329 |
| RELIEF SOUGHT BY OPPOSING PARTY | The State sought to prosecute R.A.S. for allegedly violating probation by testing positive for cocaine. R.A.S. was also being held in jail without a bond, which was devastating to R.A.S.’s new business. |
| COUNTY | Hillsborough |
| DISPOSITION | Within a week of being hired attorney Faulkner was able to get R.A.S. out of jail and back on probation with the violation of probation case completely resolved. |
| YEAR OF DISPOSITION | 2020 |
| STATE v. H.M. | |
|---|---|
| CASE NUMBER(S) | Hillsborough County Sherriff’s Office Agency Case Number 20-147667. |
| RELIEF SOUGHT BY OPPOSING PARTY | H.M. was being investigated by the Hillsborough County Sherriff’s Office for alleged Video Voyeurism. |
| COUNTY | Hillsborough |
| DISPOSITION | Within approximately one week of being hired attorney Faulkner was able to facilitate getting the Sherriff’s Office to drop all charges. |
| YEAR OF DISPOSITION | 2020 |
| STATE v. D.W. | |
|---|---|
| CASE NUMBER(S) | 19-CT-019888 |
| RELIEF SOUGHT BY OPPOSING PARTY | The State was prosecuting D.W. for alleged racing on the highway going over 100 miles per hour, thereby potentially exposing D.W., in addition to other criminal consequences, a suspension of his driver license. |
| COUNTY | Hillsborough |
| DISPOSITION | Attorney Faulkner’s strategy in the case resulted in D.W. getting a withhold of adjudication (NO CONVICTION) as to the amended charge of reckless driving (a better charge), just a fine and court costs with NO LICENSE SUSPENSION. The sentence was so favorable to D.W. that the judge thought it was too lenient and had to be convinced to accept the resolution. |
| YEAR OF DISPOSITION | 2020 |
2019
| D.A.G. v. A.A.G. | |
|---|---|
| CASE NUMBER(S) | 19-009546-FD |
| RELIEF SOUGHT BY OPPOSING PARTY | D.A.G. sought to have an Injunction Against Domestic Violence imposed upon client, A.A.G. |
| COUNTY | Pinellas |
| DISPOSITION | Injunction denied following an Injunction Hearing. |
| YEAR OF DISPOSITION | 2019 |
| D.A.G. v. A.A.G. | |
|---|---|
| CASE NUMBER(S) | 2019DR006095DRAXES |
| RELIEF SOUGHT BY OPPOSING PARTY | D.A.G. sought for a second time to have an Injunction Against Domestic Violence imposed upon client, A.A.G. |
| COUNTY | Pasco |
| DISPOSITION | Petition for Injunction was voluntarily dismissed by D.A.G. |
| YEAR OF DISPOSITION | 2019 |
| STATE OF FLORIDA v. S.P. | |
|---|---|
| CASE NUMBER(S) | 2019-CT-001510CTAXWS 2019-TR-013577TRAXWS |
| CHARGE(S) | Driving Under the Influence (DUI) (.235 breath) Open Container |
| COUNTY | Pasco |
| DISPOSITION | DUI reduced to Reckless Driving, withhold of adjudication (no conviction) Open Container dismissed |
| YEAR OF DISPOSITION | 2019 |
| FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY & MOTOR VEHICLES v. S.P. | |
|---|---|
| TYPE OF HEARING | Formal Review Hearing |
| REASON FOR SUSPENSION | Breath test over the legal limit |
| COUNTY | Hillsborough |
| DISPOSITION | Suspension invalidated based upon an unlawful arrest. |
| YEAR OF DISPOSITION | 2019 |
| A.G. v. F.W. | |
|---|---|
| CASE NUMBER(S) | 12-DR-14439 |
| RELIEF SOUGHT BY OPPOSING PARTY | Client, F.W. sought to reduce the amount of child support he was paying to A.G. both retroactively and going forward. Client also sought to have A.G. pay some of his attorney’s fees. |
| COUNTY | Client, F.W. sought to reduce the amount of child support he was paying to A.G. both retroactively and going forward. Client also sought to have A.G. pay some of his attorney’s fees. |
| COUNTY | Hillsborough |
| DISPOSITION | Client’s child support was reduced by $252.88. In addition, client was awarded a credit against his child support obligation in the amount of $7,863.72. Finally, A.G. was ordered to pay $3,398.75 of client’s attorney’s fees, which resulted in a credit for that amount against client’s child support obligation. |
| YEAR OF DISPOSITION | 2019 |
| STATE OF FLORIDA v. Z.F. | |
|---|---|
| CASE NUMBER(S) | 18-CF-012412-A |
| CHARGE(S) | Aggravated Assault with a Firearm |
| COUNTY | Hillsborough |
| DISPOSITION | Veteran’s Court Diversion despite State’s initial refusal to resolve the case in that manner. |
| YEAR OF DISPOSITION | 2019 |
| STATE OF FLORIDA v. D.K. | |
|---|---|
| CASE NUMBER(S) | 2019-CM-002637 |
| CHARGE(S) | Battery |
| COUNTY | Hillsborough |
| DISPOSITION | Misdemeanor Diversion despite State initially seeking jail due to the severity of the injuries to the alleged victim. |
| YEAR OF DISPOSITION | 2019 |
| STATE OF FLORIDA v. A.M.M. | |
|---|---|
| CASE NUMBER(S) | 19-CF-009862 |
| CHARGE(S) | Fraudulent Use of a Credit Card Grand Theft |
| COUNTY | Hillsborough |
| DISPOSITION | All charges dropped by the State |
| YEAR OF DISPOSITION | 2019 |
| B.A.J. v. J.G.M. | |
|---|---|
| CASE NUMBER(S) | 19-DR-006912 |
| RELIEF SOUGHT BY OPPOSING PARTY | B.A.J. sought to have an Injunction Against Domestic Violence imposed upon client, J.G.M. |
| COUNTY | Hillsborough |
| DISPOSITION | Motion to Dismiss granted. |
| YEAR OF DISPOSITION | 2019 |
| K.M.P. v. D.L.A. | |
|---|---|
| CASE NUMBER(S) | 18-DR-008063 |
| RELIEF SOUGHT BY OPPOSING PARTY | K.M.P. sought to have an Injunction Against Domestic Violence imposed upon client, D.L.A. |
| COUNTY | Polk |
| DISPOSITION | Injunction denied. |
| YEAR OF DISPOSITION | 2019 |
2018
| STATE OF FLORIDA v. M.S. | |
|---|---|
| CASE NUMBER(S) | State Attorney’s Office Case Number 2018-000600 |
| CHARGE(S) | Two counts of Attempted Murder. M.S. allegedly shot two individuals. |
| COUNTY | Hillsborough |
| DISPOSITION | The State declined to file charges. |
| YEAR OF DISPOSITION | 2018 |
| O.F. v. R.S. | |
|---|---|
| CASE NUMBER(S) | 18-DR-615 |
| RELIEF SOUGHT BY OPPOSING PARTY | O.F. sought to have an Injunction Against Domestic Violence imposed upon client, R.K. |
| COUNTY | Hillsborough |
| DISPOSITION | Injunction denied following an Injunction Hearing. |
| YEAR OF DISPOSITION | 2018 |
| A.C. v. C.D. | |
|---|---|
| CASE NUMBER(S) | 18-DR-001911 |
| RELIEF SOUGHT BY OPPOSING PARTY | Client sought to have an Injunction Against Domestic Violence imposed upon opposing party, C.D. |
| COUNTY | Hillsborough |
| DISPOSITION | Injunction granted. |
| YEAR OF DISPOSITION | 2018 |
| D.F. v. J.J. | |
|---|---|
| CASE NUMBER(S) | 13-DR-010094 |
| RELIEF SOUGHT BY OPPOSING PARTY | Client, J.J., sought to have an Injunction Against Domestic Violence that had been imposed upon against him years earlier dismissed. |
| COUNTY | Hillsborough |
| DISPOSITION | Injunction dismissed. |
| YEAR OF DISPOSITION | 2018 |
2017
| STATE OF FLORIDA v. B.N.H. | |
|---|---|
| CASE NUMBER(S) | 2017-CM-006008 |
| CHARGE(S) | Battery |
| COUNTY | Hillsborough |
| DISPOSITION | All charges dropped by the State. |
| YEAR OF DISPOSITION | 2017 |
| C.D.M. v. M.P.S. | |
|---|---|
| CASE NUMBER(S) | 17-DR-007554 |
| RELIEF SOUGHT BY OPPOSING PARTY | Client, D.D.M., sought to have an Injunction Against Domestic Violence imposed upon opposing party, M.P.S. |
| COUNTY | Hillsborough |
| DISPOSITION | Injunction granted. |
| YEAR OF DISPOSITION | 2017 |
